<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Universities face closure?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dontwasteyourtime.co.uk/miscellaneous/universities-face-closure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dontwasteyourtime.co.uk/miscellaneous/universities-face-closure/</link>
	<description>eLearning, mLearning, Web 2.0, Blogging and the stuff in between</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:51:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Hopkins</title>
		<link>http://www.dontwasteyourtime.co.uk/miscellaneous/universities-face-closure/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>David Hopkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontwasteyourtime.co.uk/?p=2035#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Just read this new post from Seth Godin: &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/08/education-at-the-crossroads.html&quot; target=&quot;new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Education at the crossroads&lt;/a&gt;&quot;. In it Seth sees, not a crossroad, but three choices for Universities to make if they are to &#039;survive&#039;. These are;

- Should this be scarce or abundant?
- Should this be free or expensive?
- Should this be about school or about learning?

Seth says that we need to &quot;imagine a school that&#039;s built around free, abundant learning. And compare it to one that&#039;s focused on scarce, expensive schooling. Or dream up  your own combination.&quot;

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just read this new post from Seth Godin: &#8220;<a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/08/education-at-the-crossroads.html" target="new" rel="nofollow">Education at the crossroads</a>&#8220;. In it Seth sees, not a crossroad, but three choices for Universities to make if they are to &#8216;survive&#8217;. These are;</p>
<p>- Should this be scarce or abundant?<br />
- Should this be free or expensive?<br />
- Should this be about school or about learning?</p>
<p>Seth says that we need to &#8220;imagine a school that&#8217;s built around free, abundant learning. And compare it to one that&#8217;s focused on scarce, expensive schooling. Or dream up  your own combination.&#8221;</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Skibell</title>
		<link>http://www.dontwasteyourtime.co.uk/miscellaneous/universities-face-closure/comment-page-1/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Skibell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dontwasteyourtime.co.uk/?p=2035#comment-151</guid>
		<description>I wonder if consolidation in the industry would lower prices?

Most academic institutions seem inefficient. If we had fewer, perhaps with shared resources, could the cost be lowered? In the States, the cost of a degree is getting out of reach of the middle-class. If fewer people can afford to go, bloated universities have to jack up tuition even more. This isn&#039;t sustainable.

How are the universities going to change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if consolidation in the industry would lower prices?</p>
<p>Most academic institutions seem inefficient. If we had fewer, perhaps with shared resources, could the cost be lowered? In the States, the cost of a degree is getting out of reach of the middle-class. If fewer people can afford to go, bloated universities have to jack up tuition even more. This isn&#8217;t sustainable.</p>
<p>How are the universities going to change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

